Electronics

Kindle

Thursday, November 22, 2012

This is the turning point for Uganda - Muntu



At 6:36pm yesterday, the FDC Electoral Commission chairperson, Mr Dan Mugarura, announced that Maj. Gen. Muntu had returned 393 votes (50.64 per cent), defeating Leader of the Opposition in Parliament, Mr Nathan Nandala Mafabi, who got 361 votes (46.392 per cent).


Tororo County MP Geoffrey Ekanya came third with 17 votes (2.91 per cent) in the three-horse race to lead the biggest opposition party in the country.

Gen Muntu’s win marked the end of a tense 90 days that saw the three candidates traverse the country to canvass for votes in a campaign which has tested the FDC’s ability to stay united.

The party rules provide that a winner would be decided if one candidate gathered 50 per cent plus one vote.

A total of 776 votes were cast as the party marked a transition from founding president, Dr Kizza Besigye, who has thrice run against President Museveni in bitterly fought national polls. Dr Besigye has consistently rejected the outcome of his contests with Mr Museveni in 2001, 2006 and 2011 as having been rigged in favour of the incumbent.

Jubilation

Delegates, who had convened at Namboole stadium erupted in jubilation as Gen. Muntu was lifted shoulder high by supporters.

The Mafabi camp was clearly devastated, with some of his supporters collapsing.

Mr Mafabi, however, promised to work with the winner and asked members to be accountable to the party. Proceedings at Namboole were not without some drama. At polling station number 7, controversy brewed, forcing a recount of votes.

Mr Toterebuka Bamwenda, the FDC deputy spokesperson, and a member of the Elect-Nandala task force, said his team would petition the FDC National Election Tribunal over “multiple voting”.

“Alice Alaso voted seven times and Francis Epetait voted three times,” Mr Bamwenda said. Ms Alaso, who is the party secretary general, however, said she would reply after reading the promised petition.

Tension, excitement and intrigue characterised yesterday’s election as delegates drawn from Uganda’s 80 districts as at 2010 struggled to marshal last minute support for their candidates.

Police was heavily deployed in and around the stadium complex as voting commenced at 2pm. Earlier, at 11am, rumours of voter bribery rippled through the conference. A lady identified as Ms Anita Among was reportedly caught distributing money. No action was taken by party security though. Other unknown persons were seen holding tags written on “Namboole staff” although the stadium management could not positively identify them as part of their staff.
At the main gates, there were skirmishes as police fought off people without accreditation. Most claimed to be delegates who had been disenfranchised. Several people were arrested on suspicion that they wanted to take advantage of the commotion to commit crimes.


Dr Besigye had stayed in the shadows throughout the campaign, refusing to take sides in a process which sometimes threatened to come undone by mudslinging, sectarian tendencies and accusations of voter manipulations.

Yesterday, he told delegates he was leaving the party leadership “to concentrate on the struggle to liberate Uganda.”

Dr Besigye leaves the party leadership just two years shy of the end of his presidency, which would have ended in 2014.

“Once I have handed over the party leadership today, I will concentrate on the struggle to liberate Uganda,” he said.

This was yet the first hint Dr Besigye was giving that he will again offer himself for election when the country goes to the polls in 2016. The FDC constitution allows any party member, popularly elected, to stand as party flag bearer in national elections.

“I will be available to the new party leadership and to the party if called upon to do so. I am not going to the tall grasses,” Dr Besigye added.
“Last month I completed seven years as leader of the FDC. I felt going beyond seven years would be disgraceful,” he said. Dr Besigye also outlined five principles which he said the new party president should adopt.

\“The new leader must devise new methods of raising money for the party, promoting the party’s ideology, building the party’s grass-root support and leadership,” Dr Besigye said.

Tensions reached fever-pitch when the candidates took to the podium to make a final case for support.

There had also been debate on whether party Ms Alaso should be allowed to deliver a status report on the party’s affairs.

Ms Alaso was later granted seven minutes to deliver the party’s status report.

Candidates resorted to catchy names. Gen. Muntu described himself as a “fearless patriot” while Mr Mafabi called himself a “villager”. Mr Ekanya chose to describe himself as a “musician and a dancer.”

Taking to the podium first, the “patriot” lashed at critics who suggest that he is “an NRM mole and a coward”. “Those who say I am an NRM mole, you hurt me deeply. Everything I have done has been to promote FDC,” he moved.

“You call me a coward, a man who led an army of 100,000 men and seven factions and left it intact with no factions?” he added.

He asked delegates not to vote for him if they sympathise with him.

“I don’t need your sympathies. Twice, I have handled defeat and you have seen how I have behaved. Now, trust me with victory and I will not disappoint you,” he said.

“I have been specifically designed to fit in the strategy of FDC, to liberate this country by hastening the exit of this regime,” the former army boss, added.

“The villager” was next, describing himself as a “general” in mobilisation. “FDC needs hands-on leaders. If I managed the Bugisu Corporative Union to its present success, what more can I do for this party and country,” Mr Mafabi said.

“Good party structures in the grassroots will automatically campaign for the party. I have the capacity as a villager to reach the grassroots. I have done it time and again,” he added.

Mr Ekanya, the “dancer”, told the gathered faithful that time had come to change the manner in which FDC affairs are run.

He castigated the trend where the party president has automatically gone on to be the party’s flag bearer. “A party in the opposition cannot behave like a party in power. We must change internally before we can change this country otherwise we are doomed,” he said.

“When the time came to create the necessary music to kick President Museveni out of power, few showed up. It is time for the men and women of FDC to stand up and be counted,” Mr Ekanya added

REACTIONS TO VOTE


Mr Joachim Buwembo, Journalist. Congratulations to Gen. Mugisha Muntu, a man of privileged background who could have had it easy and comfortable all the way from his campus days ... through the current administration, but chose to always be on the side of the people...


Ms Betty Akello [Farmer]


The election was good and well oraganised and I did not find anything wrong with it that might affect the credibility of the winner.

Sheik Sinan Kagwa [Businessman]

On the Ugandan level, it was a fairly managed event. What the delegates had not understood was the provision of MPs voting for others [by proxy] which was explained to us by the electoral commission later.

Mr Habib Kasolo [Businessman]. I came to vote but when it came to elections time, MPs like Alaso, Nabilah and Epetait were voting more than once which made me very disturbed.

Ms Naiga Yudaya [Salon attendant].

The process was not going on badly until we learnt that the secretary general had voted more than once which might spoil our party as we have been trying to set an example.

Ms Nassuna Nulu [Farmer]

I didn’t find any major problems with the process that would affect the results.

By Solomon Arinaitwe
The making of the new FDC party president


Maj. Gen. Mugisha Muntu was born on January 1, 1958.

He studied Political Science at Makerere University. He served as the Army Commander from 1989 until 1998.

Muntu served served in the army at a time when, according to him, many “excited army officers” would keep sacks full of money in their offices.

There was “no” accounting system. He is credited for putting a stop to this and for not having abused his office to amass wealth.

A commendation would have been forthcoming, but for the 1995 Atiak massacre of 200 Ugandans allegedly by the Lord’s Resistance Army and for the 1998 killing of 80 students of Kichwamba Technical Institute by the Allied Democratic Force(s).

So President Museveni allegedly sacked him in 1998 when he (Muntu) was on leave.

Muntu later joined the opposition after falling out with the NRM over corruption and other forms of misrule. He also saw that Ugandans were now more divided by tribe and region than they have ever been – a consequence of President Museveni’s politics of cronyism.











Thursday, November 8, 2012

Britain and Ireland suspend aid to Uganda after 10 million pounds missing funds ends up in Prime Minister's Acount.


Up to £10 million of foreign aid was transferred to Patrick Amama Mbabazi's private account
The aid money was a joint gift from Ireland, Norway, Denmark and Sweden
Britain has joined Ireland in suspending all aid payments to Uganda

By Sam Greenhill and Daniel Martin

Millions of pounds in foreign aid to Uganda have been funnelled into private bank accounts of workers in its prime minister’s office.

The money was meant to have been spent on helping the needy in the poverty-ravaged African nation.

But instead the 12million euros (£10million) – a joint gift from Ireland, Norway, Denmark and Sweden – somehow wound up in accounts belonging to aides of prime minister Patrick Amama Mbabazi.


'Missing money': Britan and Ireland have frozen all aid payments after £10 million meant to help the Ugandan population ended up in accounts belonging to staff of Prime Minister Patrick Amama Mbabazi
'Missing money': Britan and Ireland have frozen all aid payments after £10 million meant to help the Ugandan population ended up in accounts belonging to staff of Prime Minister Patrick Amama Mbabazi

No British money was taken but last night Whitehall officials said they had taken the precaution of suspending British aid payments of £4million-a-year to Mr Mbabazi’s office.

In total, Britain is sending £98million this year to Uganda, most of which will continue.

More...Hungary 'to offer wealthy foreigners citizenship in return for investment'

Stop giving millions in aid to richer countries like China and India, says ex-UN chief Kofi Anna
Palestinian prisoners are handed millions in British aid with some being paid more than average UK worker

The apparent fraud was discovered when the Irish government was told by Ugandan auditors that the 12million euros had gone ‘missing’.

The sum – of which Ireland’s contribution was 4million euros (£3.2million) – was supposed to have helped pay for a ‘peace recovery and development programme’ in northern Uganda after decades of conflict and devastation.

Ireland immediately halted further payments to Uganda pending investigation.

A political storm is now raging in Dublin, with Irish foreign minister Eamon Gilmore branding the apparent theft ‘intolerable’.


'Intolerable': Irish Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore, seen here at the Irish Labour party conference, announced a suspension of all Irish aid money to Uganda
'Intolerable': Irish Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore, seen here at the Irish Labour party conference, announced a suspension of all Irish aid money to Uganda
He announced there would be no more money for Uganda ‘unless it is clear Irish money is being spent for the purpose for which it was allocated’.

The Irish ambassador in Uganda, Anne Webster, has met government officials to demand the money be repaid.

A Department for International Development spokesman said: ‘We take these allegations extremely seriously and have already suspended UK aid to the Office of the Ugandan Prime Minister. We have set up an independent audit to investigate alleged fraud.’

A DfID source said: ‘Aid to the office of the Prime Minister is entirely separate from our general budget support to the Ugandan government.

‘If money has been misused, we will expect immediate repayment and will take all necessary action to protect our funds.’



Previous fraud: British aid money helped buy a £30 million Gulfstream jet for Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni, it was revealed last year
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2225443/Brit
Previous fraud: British aid money helped buy a £30 million Gulfstream jet for Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni, it was revealed last year
Mr Mbabazi has publicly apologised to Ireland. He insisted: ‘I didn’t even know. No money was ever paid to me and I never handle money.

‘As the prime minister I don’t handle money of government at all, ever.’



Critique: Peter Bone, Tory MP for Wellingborough, said aid should have been stopped sooner

 He pledged prosecutions and said two senior officials had been charged – one of whom is the chief accountant –and 17 suspended without pay while the investigation continues.



Critique: Peter Bone, Tory MP for Wellingborough, said aid should have been stopped sooner

The apparent fraud was uncovered by Uganda’s own auditors.

Mr Mbabazi maintained that, although the missing money was discovered in private bank accounts, not all of it was ‘misappropriated’ but merely ‘irregularly managed’.

Last year it was revealed British aid money was used to buy a £30million Gulfstream jet for Uganda’s president, Yoweri Museveni. The autocratic 67-year-old leader – who was criticised after he launched a violent crackdown against democracy campaigners – bought the plane while millions of his countrymen struggled to feed themselves.

The latest revelation will reignite the row over British families being asked to fork out higher taxes to pay for aid.

Peter Bone, Tory MP for Wellingborough, said: ‘People in my constituency simply do not understand why we are giving money desperately needed at home to a corrupt regime.

‘It’s good DfID have taken action but they should have done their checks much, much earlier.

‘Uganda is not the only corrupt regime out there. I’m afraid to say it is largely endemic with some of our overseas aid.’

It was recently revealed Britain’s aid budget is rising so fast the Tories will enter the next election spending more on international development, which is immune from austerity cuts, than on the police.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2225443/Britain-Ireland-suspend-aid-Uganda-10m-funding-ends-Prime-Ministers-account.html#ixzz2Bh52ChqH

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter
DailyMail on Facebook

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Paul Ryan on tax plan: ‘It would take me too long to go through all the math’




Paul Ryan (Scott Wong/Getty Images)

 Paul Ryan says "it would take me too long to go through all the math" involved in the tax plan he and Mitt Romney are proposing.


The Republican vice presidential nominee said on "Fox News Sunday" that their plan--a 20 percent across-the-board income tax cut--would focus on deductions and closing tax loopholes for the rich, but declined to offer specifics.

The Obama campaign seized on Ryan's comments, firing off this response:

Romney has promised $5 trillion in tax cuts skewed toward millionaires and billionaires, but refused to say how he'd pay for them without raising taxes on the middle class or exploding the deficit. He's promised to repeal ObamaCare, but refused to say what he'd replace it with to protect the 129 million Americans with pre-existing conditions. He's promised to repeal Wall Street reform, but refused to say what he'd replace it with so that big banks aren't writing their own rules again.

But New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie defended the pair's tax plan on Sunday's "Meet The Press."

[Related: Chris Christie: Wednesday night's debate is 'the restart of this campaign']

"Governor Romney has a vision for the direction of this country," Christie said. "He's not an accountant. He's not going to go line by line, as much as you'd like him to do, through the budget."

Christie then pivoted to President Obama. "Let's hold the president to the same standard and criticize him as well," Christie said. "How's he going to create a million new manufacturing jobs? He hasn't told anybody the specifics of that. How's he going to reduce $4 trillion in debt? We're still waiting to hear what he thinks about Simpson-Bowles, which he commissioned. I mean, he's been the president, and hasn't given us specifics. So let's be fair here."

Ryan admitted the campaign has made several "missteps," including Mitt Romney's controversial "47 percent" comments about President Obama's core supporters. On Sunday, Ryan called those comments "inarticulate" and lacking "eloquence."

"Mitt acknowledges himself that was an inarticulate way of describing how we're worried that in a stagnant Obama economy more people have become dependent on government because they have no economic opportunity," said Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee. "It was an inarticulate way to describe what we're trying to do to create prosperity and upward mobility, and reduce dependency by getting people off welfare back to work."

Monday, September 10, 2012

Turbulent Somalia gets new president in vote for change



Members of parliament overwhelmingly elected political newcomer Hassan Sheikh Mohamud as president of Somalia on Monday, a result hailed by supporters as a vote for change in the war-ravaged country.




Bursts of celebratory gunfire crackled through the streets of the capital, Mogadishu, after the first vote of its kind in decades in Somalia drew to a close.

Mohamud won in a secret ballot with 190 votes, against 79 lawmakers voting for Ahmed.

"I congratulate all Somalis. The people are taking a new direction. You are now ending the difficult path and taking a new one," Mohamud said to a cheering crowd of well-wishers.

Although Mohamud is a relatively new face in Somali politics, the one-time academic will be confronted by old problems: acrimonious clan politics, rampant corruption, maritime piracy and a stubborn Islamist insurgency.

Mohamud, seen as a moderate, unexpectedly defeated incumbent President Sheikh Sharif Ahmed after two of the four candidates who made it to the second round of voting dropped out.

One of them, outgoing Prime Minister Abdiweli Mohamed Ali, who threw his weight behind Mohamud, said the result heralded a new era for Somali politics.

"Somalia voted for change," Ali told Reuters, adding it was too early to say whether he would take part in the next administration.

Somalia has lacked an effective central government since the outbreak of civil war in 1991.

The capital, however, which until last year witnessed street battles between al Qaeda-linked al Shabaab militants and African soldiers, is now a vibrant city where reconstructed houses are
slowly replacing bullet-riddled structures.


Monday's vote was seen as a culmination of a regionally brokered, U.N.-backed roadmap to end that conflict, during which tens of thousands of people were killed and many more fled.

Despite being on the back foot, the militants still control swathes of southern and central Somalia, while pirates, regional administrations and local militia group also vie for control of chunks of the mostly lawless Horn of Africa country.

"SAFE PAIR OF HANDS"

The outgoing president conceded defeat after onlookers in the hall where the vote was held spontaneously stood up and sang the national anthem.

Attention will now focus on whether all of Somalia's rival clans respect the result, or whether disgruntled factions will seek to destabilize the next government.

"(The) elected president must cope with security first, then the reconstruction of social infrastructure, resettling the numerous (refugees) around the country and the liberation of the rest of the country from al Shabaab," student Bashir Ali Abdikadir said.

Mohamud will also have to tackle Somalia's reputation as the most corrupt country in the world.

In July, a U.N. Somalia monitoring group report said it had found that out of every $10 in revenue raised between 2009-2010 $7 had never made it into state coffers.
A U.N. official who was present at the vote on Monday described Mohamud as "progressive and a safe pair of hands".


Residents said bursts of celebratory gunfire rang out in several cities across central and southern Somalia.

"A supported change is always positive," Mohamud Farah, a spokesman for government forces based in the former rebel stronghold of Afmadow in southern Somalia, told Reuters.

Jabril Ibrahim Abdulle, director of the Somali think-tank Centre of Research and Dialogue, where Mohamud worked for eight years, said the result highlighted Ahmed's failure to quash the festering Islamist insurgency and improve living standards.

"He is benefiting from the fallout over Ahmed. This vote shows that the Somali people were yearning for change," Abdulle said. "His biggest challenge will be the expectations of the people."

MANIPULATE

Touching a Koran with his right hand, Mohamud was sworn in as president within minutes of his poll victory at a crowded hall in Mogadishu's police academy.

As president, he will head the executive while the speaker of parliament is considered the most powerful politician and steps in if the president is unable to fulfil his duties.

Mohamud graduated from the Somali National University in 1981 before obtaining a master's degree in education from India's Bhopal University in 1988.


During the early years of Somalia's civil conflict, he worked for the U.N. children's agency, UNICEF.

In 1999, the fluent English speaker co-founded the Somali Institute of Management and Administration Development in Mogadishu, which later became Simad University, and served as its dean until 2010.

In 2011, he founded the Peace and Development Party.

The selection of Somalia's new lawmakers, whose first real task was to elect a new president, was marred by allegations of bribery and intimidation designed to manipulate Monday's vote.

Even so, many Somalis were elated their country was holding an election of sorts.

"It's something we have to witness and be a part of, even if we're not voting. We've been through a very difficult labor and we're finally giving birth," said Najmah Ahmed Abdi, who runs a Somali youth forum.

"The (lawmakers) have a momentous responsibility on their shoulders. Tomorrow will be like when U.S. President Barack Obama was elected. We hope we get our own Obama."

(Additional reporting by Mohamed Ahmed and Abdi Sheikh; Writing by Yara Bayoumy and Richard Lough; Editing by Alison Williams and Michael Roddy)








Thursday, August 30, 2012

Romney officially accepts GOP nomination - Americas - Al Jazeera English

Romney officially accepts GOP nomination - Americas - Al Jazeera English

Museveni slams Western military intervention in developing nations

President Yoweri Museveni has criticized western intervention in developing countries saying it interferes with their development and that of local leaders. He made the remarks at the opening in Tehran, Iran, of a two-day Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit.


“At this very moment, the former imperialist countries are exhibiting new ambitions of re-establishing hegemony over the Third Word – Africa, the Middle East, etc. There are plans of new military bases around the globe. Military bases to fight whom and why?” Museveni said.

“The recent phenomenon by some Western countries of “bombing for democracy”, “no-fly zones”, etc., is a mistake and it interferes with the development of the affected countries. If there is, indeed, oppression in a given country, the genuine freedom fighters will emerge and liberate that country.”

President Museveni mentioned a number of revolutions – Iran, the Arab Spring revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, and the French Revolution of 1789 –that he said were not sponsored by anyone. “Genuine revolutions do not need sponsorship from outside, “ Mr Museveni said.

A total of 29 heads of state or government on Thursday are attending the summit, which accounts for around a quarter of the 120 members represented at the meet, and which Iranian officials are hailing as evidence of their country's important status in the world.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon is attending the summit as an observer. The NAM brings together many developing nations and accounts for two-thirds of the UN's 193-nation membership.

Below is the President’s speech in full.



Your Excellency Dr.Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran;

Mr. Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations;

Heads of State and Government;

Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen.

By 1900, the whole of Africa, except for Ethiopia, was under colonialism. India, Indonesia, Indo-China, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, the Middle East and the Caribbean were also under colonialism. China was a semi-colony being predated on by European imperialism.

The colonization of Africa was because of our internal weaknesses – small chiefdoms and kingdoms or segmentary societies. This was in spite of the fact that the entire continent of Africa, eleven million square miles of land area, is occupied by only four language groups:

• the Niger-Congo group of languages (including the Bantu dialects);

• the Nilo-Saharan (including the Cushitic languages like the Nubian and the Somali);

• the Afro-Asiatic languages (Arabic, Tigrinya and Amharic); and

• the small Khoisan languages of Southern Africa (the so-called bushmen).

Therefore, Africa is not as disparate as it is made out to be by the foreigners and the local traitors as well as reactionaries. Moreover, the four language groups have linkages among themselves. Nevertheless, political integration was limited and this is where the problem was. Africans are similar or linked but they were not governed together for much of the time. Trade, however, took place from the coast to the interior. It is this low level of political integration that enabled the colonialists to conquer Africa. This is why we, the pan-Africanists, work for African political and economic integration.


Colonialism brought about serious distortions and human haemorrhage in the form of slave trade, massacres, genocide and the killing of indigenous industries. The other colonized peoples also suffered greatly under colonialism – although that colonialism took different forms. By the 1960s, European colonialism had been ejected from Asia, the Caribbean, Africa, etc. European imperialism was defeated because of three factors:

• the resistance of the colonized peoples;

• the emergence of the socialist camp in the USSR (1917), China (1949) and in other countries; and

• the inter-imperialist wars of 1914-18 and 1939-45 which had greatly weakened the imperialist countries to our advantage.

After the Second World War, the imperialist countries tried to re-impose or maintain their colonialism in Indo-China, India, Africa, etc. They were defeated by the anti-colonial forces supported by the socialist countries and other peace-loving peoples in the West (Western Europe, the USA, Canada, etc). There were outright military victories for the nationalist forces in Indo-China, Mozambique, Angola or negotiated retreats like in Kenya. The cleverer imperialists granted independence without the need for a military fight. This was the case in India and many countries in Africa.


In the case of Africa, the colonial distortions disabled the young countries from taking off. Colonial sergeants, now wielding batons of “Field Marshals” at the head of a few battalions, grabbed power from the independence civilians, wreaked havoc on our countries and population, off-loading on us their bestial colonial character and ignorance – a consequence of very low educational levels of the colonial times. We had to wage new struggles and new wars to get rid of these colonial sergeants – some of them (e.g. Mobutu) only 15 years ago.

Africa is beginning to move in all spheres – democracy, education, regional integration, health (that is why population has grown), some aspects of the infrastructure (e.g. mobile telephones, internet, etc) and some aspects of economic production (agriculture, tourism, industry, mining, etc.). Meanwhile, our partners in Asia, partly because of a much higher degree of political and economic integration, have made more strides, especially in China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, etc. Brazil in South America is also emerging as a great industrial power.
Yet, at this very moment, the former imperialist countries are exhibiting new ambitions of re-establishing hegemony over the Third Word – Africa, the Middle East, etc. There are plans of new military bases around the globe. Military bases to fight whom and why?


The recent phenomenon by some Western countries of “bombing for democracy”, “no-fly zones”, etc., is a mistake and it interferes with the development of the affected countries. If there is, indeed, oppression in a given country, the genuine freedom fighters will emerge and liberate that country. I participated in two liberation wars in Uganda against two different regimes (i.e. 1971-79 and 1981-86). In the first war, we had support from our brothers the Tanzanians. After that war, we could not solve any political problems because even our own brothers, the Tanzanians, could not understand our internal issues. They were overwhelmed by opportunists and charlatans from within Uganda and they ended up making mistakes. In the second war, we were by ourselves and genuine freedom fighters came to the forefront. We did not only liberate Uganda, but also we built capacity that has even benefited the region.

There was a revolution here, in Iran. Who sponsored it to remove the very powerful government of the Shah? Recently, there were revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt. Who sponsored them? Who sponsored the French revolution in 1789? Who sponsored the Russian revolution in 1917? Genuine revolutions do not need sponsorship from outside. Certainly, not “bombings” and no-fly zones.
The universal awakening of the human race is unstoppable. Many of us are beginning to use electricity, to drive cars, to stay in good and permanent houses built from cement and steel bars (mitayimbwa) and to eat better food. This universal human advance has meant that the prices of steel, of oil, of copper, of food, etc., have gone up. This is good for Africa. It may not be good for those who are used to living a life of luxury at the expense of others. Some years ago, we tried to develop our iron-ore deposits but we could not get investors to do so. Why?


It was because, I was told, there was a ‘glut’ of steel in the world. Why was there that ‘glut’ of steel? It was because the users (consumers) were few (i.e. Western Europe, North America and Japan). What is the situation now? So many millions of people in China, India, Brazil, South America, Africa, other parts of Asia have got out of poverty. Therefore, the price of steel had jumped from US$ 200 per tonne around late 1980s and early 1990s to US$ 1,200 around 2009. This is good news for Uganda. If it is not good news for those who have been living well at the expense of others, they must learn how to earn an honest living, through hard work and fair trade. If they think that they will rely on the old vices of grabbing other peoples’ resources by war and aggression, then, they must be resisted ferociously. Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, the Caribbean and the progressive countries of Europe such as Russia have all the means to resist renewed hegemonic efforts by the declining former imperialist powers
This is exactly what we did in the anti-colonial phase. Besides, we know that even within the former imperialist countries, there are progressive forces that can have a balanced relationship with us. These progressive tendencies in the former imperialist countries will, however, only be encouraged if the adventurist schemes of the aggressors are defeated.


There is, however, one problem in the anti-imperialist camp apart from the absence of a common action. It is the problem of chauvinism and sectarianism: this religious sect against that religious sect; this tribe against that tribe; etc. This was the weakness of Africa in the past. We defeated colonialism wherever this problem was overcome – Mozambique, Tanzania, ANC of South Africa, Uganda in the anti-fascist wars within Uganda, etc. Mao Tse Tung exhorted the Chinese that imperialism was the main enemy and that all national forces had to combine to defeat this principal enemy.

He said:
The oppressed peoples and nations must not pin their hopes for liberation on the “sensibleness” of imperialism and its lackeys. They will only triumph by strengthening their unity and persevering in their struggle.

Here in the Middle East, there is the question of Israel and Palestine. The progressive forces in Uganda believe that the correct solution for that problem is the two State solution – a Palestinian State living side by side with Israel in peace and mutual recognition. I do not see any other solution because I know it from the Bible that Jews and other Canaanites lived in that Palestine as far back as 1550 BC when Abraham came from UR (Tell el-Mukayyar), which I am told, is somewhere in the present day Iraq. The Jews were dispersed by the Romans in AD 70, having earlier been enslaved by the Persians in the year 1700 BC and Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC. Both Arabs and Jews belong to that area.


As I told His Excellency President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – our host, when I was here last time, the Bible does give us some useful information about this area, the Middle East. You remember, I told you about the Persians and Medians, who are mostly mentioned in the Book of Daniel in the Bible. Group chauvinism should be pushed aside so that we get lasting solutions to these endless problems. The tribes in Africa are a bit better on this score of mutual respect and tolerance. Moslems talk of ‘haram’ meaning something that is forbidden. I once told General Omar Bashir of Sudan that my list of ‘haram’ is much longer than his. According to my tribe, fish, chicken, pork, mutton, etc, are all ‘haram’ (ebihagaro). The difference with African tribes, however, is that each group minds its own business and never seeks to impose its culture on the neighbouring tribes. Consequently, our neighbouring tribes, who eat fish, would always come and, with our permission and support, catch mud-fish (eshonzi) in the swamp in our land. Chauvinism and ego-centrism irrationally perpetuate endless problems and endanger world peace. It is advisable that the respective human groups concentrate on common interests (trade, sharing of technology, etc) for mutual benefit and general human advancement and ignore the idiosyncrasies of the respective groups.

I thank all of you very much.

30th August 2012 - Tehran












Sunday, August 12, 2012

Uganda’s 40-year medal wait ends as Kiprotich wins marathon


Kiprotich races to win the 42km marathon during the London 2012 Olympic Games in London yesterday. AFP PHOTO



Quick facts

Full name: Stephen Kiprotich
Races: (3,000m, 3,000m Steeplechase, 5,000m, 10,000m, Cross-country and marathon)
Place of birth: Kapchorwa, Uganda
Date of birth: 27-02-1989
Weight: 54kgs
Personal Bests
3000m 7:48.06
3000m steeplechase 8:36.2
5000m 13:23:70
10,000m 28:00.9
Marathon 2:07.12

Magnificent, fabulous and astounding genius. On the last day of a remarkably outstanding London 2012 Games, Stephen Kiprotich ran the greatest marathon in Ugandan history to become the most unexpected Olympic champion.

Crossing the finishing line in the Mall near Buckingham Palace in a time of 2:08:11, the Ugandan charmed tens of thousands camped at the Queen’s home – and a global television audience of more than a billion viewers - to strike gold.

He received a Ugandan flag on the home stretch, half-glanced to see the distance between him and the chasing pack before raising it as he raced through the tape.

“Since 1972, Uganda has not won a gold medal,” Kiprotich said after the race. “We are very happy.”

It was the most surreal moment. It was beyond unimaginable. Put simply, words don’t do justice to Kiprotich’s feat achieved on a beautiful early summer afternoon.

The boy-wonder is now a Greek god. Kiprotich stands tallest in the world of athletics today morning.

He is all out on his own in the marathon. Kiprotich rewrote history for himself, Team Uganda and all 35 million Ugandans. Finally Uganda appeared on the medals table for the first time in 16 years. Two weeks of disappointment are forgotten – for now.

The national anthem was played at the Olympic stadium for the first time in 40 years. That is more than 14,600 days since John Akii Bua clinched gold at the 1972 Munich Olympics.
The Kenyans pair of Abel Kirui and Wilson Kipsang Kiprotich, odds-on favourites to win the race, could only watch in despair.
race. They appeared to have done the job.


Cue Kiprotich, the Ugandan one for avoidance of a mix-up. He was having none of it. Sensing blood, he overtook on a bend with just over 4km to go.

He now has a medallion round his neck to match great champions Usain Bolt, Shelly Ann Fraser Pryce and David Rudisha. And it is not just a medal; it is the treasured piece of silverware that brought athletes from thousands of miles away to London – gold.
Few gave Kiprotich a chance. It did not bother him a bit.

“Look out for the one athlete who everyone believes has nothing to prove,” Akii Bua always said. That athlete yesterday was Stephen Kiprotich. His shock was one that will be spoken about for ages. It was the most unforeseen gold of London 2012.

The only man who saw it coming is wearing the cherished silverware round his neck. His life has taken a positive turn forever. He is a legend of the Olympics. For the next four years, he will reign as the best marathoner in the world.

Two hours, eight minutes and eleven seconds that delivered nirvana in Uganda have skyrocketed Kiprotich’s brand world over. Endorsement deals will be at his door in the Games Village today morning with zealous marketing gurus keen to sign him on.
It is his moment. It will be his until Rio de Janeiro 2016.








Monday, August 6, 2012

Historic Curiosity probe lands safely on Mars



PASADENA, California (Reuters) - NASA's Mars science rover Curiosity landed safely late on Sunday after hurtling through the pink Martian skies at the start of a two-year quest for signs the Red Planet once hosted key ingredients for life.


Mission controllers burst into applause and cheered in relief as they received signals confirming that the rover had survived its perilous descent and arrived within its target zone at the bottom of a vast, ancient crater.

The robotic lab sailed through space for more than eight months, covering 352 million miles (566 million km), before piercing Mars' atmosphere at 13,000 miles per hour -- 17 times the speed of sound -- before starting its descent.

Moments after landing, Curiosity beamed back its first three images from the Martian surface, one of them showing a wheel of the vehicle and the rover's shadow cast on the rocky terrain.

"I can't believe this. This is unbelievable," enthused Allen Chen, the deputy lead of the rover's entry, descent and landing team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory near Los Angeles.

The craft's descent through Mars' thin atmosphere, a feat called the most elaborate and risky achievement in the annals of robotic spaceflight, turned out to be short-lived cliffhanger, much to NASA's relief.

TOUCH DOWN

Curiosity, encased in a protective capsule-like shell, utilized a first-of-its kind automated flight entry system to sharply reduce its speed before landing.

Then it rode a giant supersonic parachute, a jet-powered backpack and a never-before-used "sky crane" to touch down inside a vast impact basin called Gale Crater, located near the planet's equator in its southern hemisphere.

NASA put the official landing time of Curiosity, the first full-fledged mobile science laboratory sent to a distant world, at 10:32 p.m. Pacific time (1:32 a.m. EDT/0530 GMT).

Curiosity will spend two years exploring Gale Crater and an unusual three-mile-high mountain consisting of what appears to be sediments rising from the crater's floor.

The purpose of the $2.5 billion mission is to look for evidence that Mars - the planet most similar to Earth - may have once harbored the basic building blocks necessary for microbial life to evolve. It represents NASA's first astrobiology mission since the 1970s-era Viking probes.

The landing marks a major milestone for a U.S. space agency beset by budget cuts and the recent loss of its 30-year-old space shuttle program.

"It's an enormous step forward in planetary exploration. Nobody has ever done anything like this," said John Holdren, the top science advisor to President Barack Obama, who was visiting JPL for the event. "It was an incredible performance."

The exact condition of the rover upon arrival was not immediately clear. NASA plans to put the rover and its laboratory gear through several weeks of engineering checks before starting its two-year surface mission in earnest.

The rover, launched on November 26 from Cape Canaveral, Florida, comes equipped with an array of sophisticated instruments capable of analyzing samples of soil, rocks and atmosphere on the spot and beaming results back to Earth.

One is a laser gun that can zap a rock from 23 feet away to create a spark whose spectral image is analyzed by a special telescope to discern the mineral's chemical composition

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Anti-tobacco activists want growing banned


A man smokes a cigarette. The anti-tobacco group says effects of tobacco are increasing each day, including lung and bladder cancers.



saying the money collected in tax revenue every year is not enough to treat people with tobacco-related illnesses.


The group under the Centre for Tobacco Control in Africa while meeting in Kampala, said tobacco benefits only tobacco companies and its money does not help ordinary Ugandans.

The administrator of the Centre for Tobacco Control in Africa, Dr Sheila Ndyanabangyi, said all the money got from tobacco companies ends up treating people who get lung cancer, which is caused by tobacco.

Growing effects
“Money comes through Uganda Revenue Authority to the Ministry of Finance and economic development, which then passes it through to the public hospitals, national medical stores and the Uganda cancer institute in form of drugs for treatment of the increasing number of patients suffering tobacco-related diseases,” Dr Ndyanabangyi said.

According to Dr Ahmed Ogwal, the regional WHO adviser on tobacco use, the list of diseases originating from smoking either directly or indirectly has been growing over time to include cancer of the bladder, esophagus, larynx, lung, mouth, and throat, while smoking also has been linked to chronic lung disease chronic heart and cardiovascular disease as well as reproductive problems.


A recent study by Mr Richard Carmona, a surgeon in the US, showed that tobacco smoking causes diseases such as acute myeloid leukemia and cancers of the cervix, kidney, pancreas and stomach; abdominal aortic aneurysm, cataracts, periodontitis and pneumonia which were previously not linked to smoking.

The anti-tobacco supporters are appealing to government to pass laws that should put a total ban on all tobacco farming and selling in the country, saying the burden of treating people with these diseases lies with the government, which spends tax payers’ money on treatment of diseases which are being legally manufactured in the country every day.

They revealed that an estimated 30,500 people in Uganda die of smoke-related infections every year.

Many more, according to the survey, die due to health complications accruing from passive smoking.

While there is no exact figure of the number of people who die of tobacco-related illnesses in Uganda, what is clear is that government spends billions in treatment annually.

The Uganda Cancer Institute’s 2012/13 Budget stands at Shs103 billion, while the amount of money in terms of revenue collected from tobacco industries in Uganda every year amounts to Shs68 billion, which the anti-tobacco crusaders say is way too little to treat the diseases they help to create.


The spokesperson of British American Tobacco, Mr Solomon Muyita, however, said the tobacco industry contributes largely to the economy of Uganda in terms of foreign exchange, tax revenue and employs over one million Ugandans.

“Apart from opposing tobacco growing, they are not doing anything to contribute to the economy unlike BAT which contributes $70m.”

aayebazibwe@ug.nationmedia.com





Thursday, June 14, 2012

2012 Budget breakdown


2012/13 Budget. Govt introduces new taxes as it seeks to spur growth.



WINNERS

EDUCATION

Education continues to take the biggest chunk of the budget. Ms Kiwanuka allocated Shs1,669 billion to the sector (or 17 per cent of total budget). This is an increase from the Shs1,418b allocated in the last financial year. Primary school teachers can expect a pay rise.

INFRASTRUCTURE

The works and transport sector also got an increment in allocation. The sector will spend Shs1,651 billion up from last year’s Shs1,291 billion.

YOUTH EMPLOYMENT
An additional Shs3.25 billion has been provided to boost the Youth Venture Capital Fund for which Shs25 billion is currently being lent out to youth. The minister said Shs8b has been lent out so far.

PAYE
Government has increased the Pay As You Earn threshold from Shs130,000 to Shs235,000 per month. That means people with earning of Shs230,000 and below are exempted from this tax.

DIGITAL TECH
To facilitate smooth transition from analogue to digital terrestrial transmission by use of Set Top Boxes, import duty on Set Top Boxes was reduced from 25 percent to 0 percent for a period of one year.

GAMING AND BETTING

Whereas the minister announced that she was reinstating the VAT exemption on gambling, she increased the Gaming and Pool Betting Tax from 15 per cent to 20 per cent. This measure, she says, will generate Shs.4.3 billion.

SPIRITS/COSMETICS
The excise duty on spirits from locally-made raw materials has been raised from 45 per cent to 60 per cent. Minister also announced the introduction of a 10 per cent tax on cosmetics and perfumes.

WATER
The cost of piped water is expected to rise after the minister announced the reintroduction of VAT at 18 per cent. The measure, Ms Kiwanuka says, will generate Shs21.7 billion.




Thursday, June 7, 2012

Museveni delivers Uganda State of the Nation Address 2012



H.E. the Vice President,

Rt. Hon. Speaker of Parliament,
His Lordship, The Hon. The Chief Justice,
Rt. Hon. Deputy Speaker of Parliament,
Her Ladyship, The Deputy Chief Justice,
Rt. Hon. Prime Minister,
Honourable Ministers,
Rt. Hon. Leader of the Opposition,
Honourable Members of Parliament,
Members of the Diplomatic Corps,
Distinguished Guests,
Ladies and Gentlemen.

As usual, I will start my State of the Nation Address with the economy. This time, however, I will concentrate on only four aspects:


i)the recovery of the economy in the last 26 years;
ii)disagreement amongst us on the priority of allocation of scarce resources and the consequent delay in infrastructure development, with its implications for the delay of socio-economic transformation;
iii)sabotage of vital development projects by the indiscipline and, sometimes, selfishness of various actors, including some political leaders; and
iv)corruption as well as selfishness.

Before I talk about the above four aspects, I should also talk about the five reasons that have caused the recovery of the economy since 1986 to-date. These are:

i) security of person and property brought about by the NRM, but more especially by the discipline of NRA/UPDF;
ii) the Private Sector, whose investments account for about 77% of all total investments in the economy, including investments of our citizens of Indian origin (who contribute 25-30% of all the total investments);

iii)the macro-economic stabilization and liberalization of the economy, which enabled us to control inflation for a very long time and to free the Private Sector from bureaucratic interference;
iv) the ever-expanding consumer demand in Uganda and in the Region; and
v) some little support from Development Partners that enabled us to repair some roads, repair the Nalubaale power station, etc.


In particular, I would like to salute the former British Minister, Baroness Linda Chalker, who helped us to repair Nalubaale.

Most of these five are obvious and they need no explanation. The fact that people’s property cannot be grabbed by soldiers and that Ugandans can no longer disappear without a trace needs no explanation. I will only comment on two of the five. These are the nature of the Private Sector that propelled our recovery and the support from the Donors (Development Partners). Regarding the Private Sector that propelled our recovery, it comprises of three elements:

i) those engaged in services such as transport (matatus, boda bodas, buses, etc.), hotels, restaurants, beauty saloons, fuel stations, real estate and shopping malls;
ii) those engaged in light industry manufacturing for import substitution as well as some limited exports; and
iii) those engaged in trading, especially importing – the Kampala City Traders Association (KACITA) type.
Some of the industrial activities are linked with agriculture like fruits juices, coffee, cotton, etc. Agricultural production has certainly contributed to the recovery of the economy. Three players in agriculture have done so. These are:

i) the plantation owners (sugar, tea and coffee);
ii) the big scale farmers; and
iii)the medium scale farmers.


The subsistence farmers, who, according to the 2002 census, comprised 68% of all homesteads, still have much of their potential untapped because we have not yet mobilized them to do. The Mrs. Josephine Kizza’s model farm is the solution to their problem.

Nobody here can claim that I have not exposed all of you to this fact. If all the 40 million acres of land of Uganda that are suitable for arable farming are put to their full potential, there will be a revolution in this country. Everybody will be richer – the families themselves, the Local Governments, the churches and the mosques and the country. Through our zonal meetings, we identified the packages of enterprises for each area according to the households’ landholdings. Let all the leaders get moving on this one.

The first two elements of the Private Sector, i.e. those engaged in services and light manufacturing industries, are the most useful because they add value to the goods and services produced in Uganda. They are not like KACITA which concentrates on turning Uganda into a perpetual market for the products of foreign countries. This is where the future lies. We should have more and stronger enterprises of this type. These groups must be specifically encouraged. They should not be delayed in any way by anybody

if we want our country to go beyond where we are now. Yet the economy cannot stay where it is now. This is because it is already being overtaken by the demand for jobs by the young people as well as the demand for dollars for imports.


As you know, the light manufacturing has been in sugar, soft drinks, beer, soaps, some little textiles operations, vegetable oils (Mukwano and BIDCO), fish processing, cotton-ginning, coffee-hulling (removing the skin of the coffee berry), cement production, steel bars production (mitayimbwa), recycling of batteries, milk processing, fruit juice processing, plastics, etc. These light industries save or earn the equivalent of US$ 1,230 million for Uganda per annum. This category has got a lot of potential for expansion. If we could, for instance, stop the bad fishing practices on our lakes, deepen coffee processing beyond coffee-hulling to coffee-roasting and grinding, expand juice and milk processing, link the steel mills with the iron-ore deposits at Muko and Sukuru hills, etc, this economy would be totally transformed.

We have seen that among the categories of the Private Sector, the most useful ones are: agriculture, services (transport, banking, hotels, etc) and light industry. The perpetual importers of products that can be made here are not a positive element in the long run. As already mentioned, trading is partly positive if it involves internal distribution in Uganda and exporting our products to the Region or beyond.

Importers, however, have caused chronic haemorrhage in Africa, especially because most of the imports are simply luxury goods, not production inputs. It is important to point out that, even when they are inputs for production, it would be better if most of them were produced in Uganda and if the local products are comparable in price as well as quality to the imported ones.
Light industry is the most promising of all these. It produces products that are, indeed, very much needed for human sustenance. These include transport, food, clothing, building materials, medicines for human beings, drugs for pest control and for livestock and so on. These are all basics for human life and their demand is durable. In addition, light industries produce weapons for self-defence and, then, a country’s future is assured. These days, brains, in the form of computers, are the ones that operate machines – guiding them to do work. These are the sectors where the whole political and administrative groups should focus their attention. This is where the future of the country lies. In time, light industries will move into sectors of heavy industry such as steel manufacturing out of our good iron-ore deposits, fertilizer manufacturing, earth-moving equipment and so forth.


Yet, if you examine the sectors that have been growing fast in the last decade, you will find that they are the following: importing vehicles i.e. transport in that sense – not in the sense of manufacturing the means of transport here; beauty saloons; restaurants and hotels; bars; real estate; shopping malls and many others. These have been growing at the following average annual growth rates: banking sector – 17.2%; transport and communication services including mobile telephones – 14.3%; hotels and restaurants – 8.8%; real estate – 5.6%; other business services (saloons, stationery sales, etc) – 9.7%. If you compare them with growth in manufacturing and agriculture, the figures are as follows: 6.5% and 1.4% respectively (period 2004-2011). All these, except for hotels, are characterized by little employment potential, no export earnings and low or no technology. This is where Uganda is now.
High rates of growth but in sectors that create little employment, bring in little or no foreign exchange and, actually, sometimes squander the little foreign exchange we earn from coffee, etc, in the form of inputs imported for their operations. This source of growth does not bring socio-economic transformation quickly. Their main attraction is that they are of low technology and require little capital to start-up. These are what the indigenous Private Sector can afford as of now. This is the paradox of the present economy of Uganda: growth without creating enough employment and without earning enough foreign exchange but instead squandering the foreign exchange earned from coffee and other raw-material exports. I, therefore, think that it may be useful to distinguish between core industries that are a must in terms of sustaining human life and, then, peripheral or dependent industries that are either not as important as the other ones or dependent on the others to thrive.

The second category is easy to set up by the Private Sector as they have done in Uganda. The core ones need deliberate nurturing by the State even if they are done by the Private Sector. It is the country that needs them and not the Private Sector.


More often, you hear misnomers such as “factory y’ omuyindi”. There are no Indians’ factories in Uganda. The Indians’ factories are in India even if they are built and owned by non-Indians. What we have in Uganda are Ugandan factories operated or owned by Indian families. Those Indians are working for us. Those factories, by whomsoever, expand our GDP, not that of India. Whose raw-materials do they buy? Whose utilities (electricity, water, telephones, etc) do they use? Which market do they produce products for? Who benefits from their export earnings? Whose youth are employed by these factories – ours or the Indian ones? To which Government do they pay taxes? When you answer each of the questions above, you will discover that these are Ugandan factories and not Indian factories. That ignorant talk should stop.
The three sugar factories in Uganda i.e. Kakira, Lugazi and Kinyara save Uganda US$ 232 million in import substitution per annum. They paid 400 billion shillings in taxes in the Financial Year 2010/2011. They employ 19,000 Ugandans and engage over 200,000 people in indirect employment including out-growers, transporters, traders, stockiest, etc. In the Financial Year 2010/2011, they earned US$ 41 million in export earnings. When all the three expand as they plan to, these factories will earn about US$ 60 million in export earnings and will pay over 600 billion shillings in taxes per annum. The three factories will also employ 25,000 Ugandans and produce a total of 450,000 metric tonnes of sugar per annum instead of the present 290,000 metric tonnes per annum.


What is planned for sugar should also be planned for coffee, milk, fruits, maize, rice, irish potatoes, beans, wheat, beef and so on. It should be the same plan for minerals, wood products and, of course, fish products.

This brings me back to the four factors I mentioned at the beginning of this speech, namely:

i) the recovery of the economy in the last 26 years;
ii) disagreement amongst us on the prioritization of the allocation of scarce resources and the attendant delays in our infrastructure projects;
iii) sabotage of vital development projects; and
iv)corruption as well as egocentrism based on monetary gain or political opportunism.

Political opportunism involves failure to tell the people what the country needs and instead pandering to uninformed, wrong and populist positions. This is suicidal. Calling cancer ‘flu’ is the surest way of killing the patient. Uganda needs more factories, not just beauty saloons, bars, fuel stations, boda bodas and taxis.


As already said above, I have talked about elements of a modernized Ugandan economy based on natural resources such as agriculture, minerals, fishing, wood products, tourism, etc. There are, however, also knowledge-based industries. These are products of the brain such as cars, machines, computers, processing formulae for food (value addition), medicines, vaccines, etc. Fortunately, our people have designed an electric car. They have processed flour out of bananas. They have made juices out of our traditional foods and medicines out of our traditional medicinal herbs. They have made perfumes out of our traditional herbs (emigaju), etc. These have got huge economic potential – much more than coffee as a raw-material and the like. Scientific innovations and scientists in general must, therefore, be given priority, in terms of Government funding.

I have already told you the factors that led to the recovery of Uganda, namely
•security of persons and property;

•macro-economic stabilization and liberalization;
•expanding national and Regional demand;
•the Private Sector that is responsible for most of the investments; and
•some little Donor support.

All these factors would, however, have assisted greater and faster expansion if we had dealt more decisively with the issue of infrastructure - especially electricity, roads and the railway. Depending on Donor support, we have done some roads, repaired Nalubaale, etc. However, socio-economic transformation needs much more than that. For example, to be where Malaysia is now, we need, at least 11,954 MW of electricity. With Bujagali, we shall be having only 781 MW. This will give us a kWh per capita of 196 compared to the one of the USA of 12,914. Although, we are still lagging behind other developed countries, we recognize that we have made progress in this area. In 1986, Uganda was generating only 60 MW and had a kWh per capita of 28. This was a big shame.

We must also tarmac all the major roads for both economic and political reasons. Depending on funding from foreign sources is not enough. The only sure answer is to rely on our own means. Tax collection in 1986 was only 5 billion shillings. Our tax collection next Financial Year is projected at 7,132 billion shillings. In the Financial Year ending June 2012, we collected 6,169 billion shillings. It was shared out as follows:

) Wage bill and allowances - 1,807 billion

2) Roads - 1,284 billion
3) Energy - 1,200 billion
4) Education - 664 billion
5) Health - 792 billion
6) Defence and Security - 407 billion
7) Local Government - 212.9 billion
As you can see, the wage bill takes about 1,807 billion shillings. This is the largest share in our budget distribution. Recently, I launched the construction of the Arua-Oraba-Kaaya road which will cost us 142 billion shillings including 10 billion shillings for compensating people’s properties near the road. If, therefore, the wage bill was 1,000 billion shillings instead of being 1,807 shillings, we would have saved about 800 billion shillings per annum for roads and dams. Over a five year period, we would have accumulated about 4,000 billion shillings. That would enable us to do about 29 roads like Arua-Oraba-Kaaya. What impact would this have on the economy?

According to Uganda National Road Authority (UNRA) and according to me, in my capacity as President who travels across the country quite often, there are 44 roads in Uganda with a total length of 3,466 kms that should be tarmacked. The list is attached as appendix I. The estimated cost is US$ 4,076 million or 9,791 billion shillings. UNRA puts these roads in two categories: A and B. There are 19 roads in category A. These need US$ 1,428 million or 3,435 billion shillings. These roads are the following
1. Olwiyo-Gulu-Kitgum (167 kms)

2. Moroto-Nakapiripirit (92 kms)
3. Muyembe-Nakapiripirit/Moroto-Kotido (193 kms)
4. Soroti-Katakwi-Moroto-Lokitanyala (208 kms)
5. Kapchorwa-Suam (77 kms)
6. Villa Maria-Sembabule (48 kms)
7. Mpigi-Maddu-Sembabule (135 kms)
8. Mukono-Kyetume-Katosi-Nyenga (74 kms)
9. Ntungamo-Kakitumba/Mirama Hills (37 kms)
10. Rukungiri-Kihihi-Kanungu-Ishasha (74 kms)
11. Kyenjojo-Kabwoya (102.4 km)
12. Buwaya-Kasanje-Mpigi-Kibibi-Mityana (90 kms)
13. Hoima-Butiaba-Wanseko (111 kms)
14. Kayunga- Bbale-Galiraya (88.5 kms)
15. Kabale (Ikumba)-Kanungu-Buhoma (120.0 kms)
16. Ishasha-Katunguru (88.0 kms)
17. Kabale-Bunyonyi (6.0 kms)
18. Mbale-Lwakhakha (41.0 kms)
19. Atiak-Adjumani-Moyo-Afoji (104.0 kms)

Today, I stand here with pride as one of the founders of NRM, ever since 1971, when we started the struggle against criminality and misrule in Uganda. As I have repeatedly told you, tax collection was only 5 billion shillings in 1986. It is now 7,000 billion shillings. If this money was distributed in a kiyekera (guerrilla) way, we could certainly do these roads ourselves – at least the 19 roads in the UNRA’s
category A that need 3,400 billion shillings. If the wage bill was only 1,000 billion shillings instead of 1,800 billion shillings, by saving 800 billion shillings per annum, we would accumulate 4,000 billion shillings in five years. This sum of money is more than enough to do the 19 roads we have been struggling with.


The clamour for higher pay by public servants and political leaders is, therefore, untimely and unfair to the 34 million Ugandans. Remember political and public service workers are only 300,000 in number. Even if you assume that each one of them has 5 persons under him or her, that would put the figure at 1.5 million beneficiaries. How about the other 32.5 million? The correct thing to do, now that we have some money, is to serve the many before we serve the few. If we were patriotic and undertook a voluntary salary cut for a number of years, we would build these roads ourselves.


While I still await patriotic offers about the voluntary salary cuts, I have initiated some talks with National Social Security Fund (NSSF) regarding the possibility of borrowing some money from them to do some of the roads. The NSSF does not have that much money. It only has 2,800 billion shillings. Possibly, we could borrow something like 1,000 billion shillings from them. That would cover some of the roads but not all of them.

There are other funding options which we are looking at with some people in connection with European and Chinese Banks, with some foreign countries, etc.

With our oil, matters will be easier. We shall be able to fund the roads, the railway and the power stations easily using our own money.


For some of the roads, we may have to forego some of the expenditure items and concentrate on the roads instead.

In the meantime, I demand that the clamour for more pay and allowances by public servants and political leaders must stop so that we concentrate on the roads and power. The only public servants that deserve pay rise are the scientists because they contribute decisively to the economy and their contribution is unique. It is not easy to replicate. The promise we had made to the teachers and other public servants of 250 billion will go ahead for at least this Financial Year. I feel very bad to see this 6,169 billion shillings we have succeeded in generating being used in a manner that does not build a higher threshold for our economy. Once we build a road, it will be there for 20 years. Salaries are monthly. Increment of salaries should wait until we have dealt with infrastructure or until our oil and gas are operational so that we can use the proceedings to fund infrastructure. Then, we can start moving again on wages.

I know inadequate salaries are also a challenge to the families of public servants. Uganda, however, is not like Europe. Many of the public servants have land at home and can grow food to supplement the yet small salaries until the situation improves. When we build the base of our economy, we shall all be better off.

Although I am not in favour of salary increases in the public service, there are two categories that are still left out. These are the councilors at the district level and the LCI Chairpersons. These persons monitor Government programmes, maintain security in villages and adjudicate cases. Yet, they have been getting very little or no facilitation at all. A provision of about 20 billion shillings per annum could cater for these two groups provided creation of new villages and new sub-counties stops.


Therefore, those who have been pushing for salary and allowance increases at this time, when we have not finished the base of the economy, are committing a serious mistake. The only people that should get salary increases should be the scientists, as I have already said. These are people we cannot easily replace. Yet we need them for the knowledge-based economy such as making cars, making computers, adding value to agricultural products, fabricating machines and machine-parts, etc. I have already talked about this above.

Those who push for salary and allowance increases as well as endless travels abroad are the same ones that complain that this road is not done, that project is not done, etc. This is hypocritical and should stop. Our discipline of Buhekyera (guerrilla strategy) educated us in the art of first dealing with the core issues and then dealing with peripheral issues later. As bush fighters, I have always told you that we concentrated on the gun and its ammunition, the recruit and some food. The rest, including clothes, medicine, etc., would be got by attacking the enemy units. This is how we built our Army.

The core issues in this economy are:


•defence and security;
•law and order;
•electricity;
•roads;
•the railway;
•piped water for the big towns;
•education;
•health;
•tourism; and
•scientific innovation.

With this foundation in place, we can, then, start looking at wage increases. It was not accidental that the salary of the President was 150,000 shillings between 1986 and 1996. It was deliberate. If one consumes little and invests more, the future will be guaranteed. If one consumes a lot and invests little, the future will be doomed. Spending prematurely on wages is really bad planning. It makes Government spend too much on recurrent costs, yet with capital projects, you spend only once and you do not repeat such expenditure for decades.

Since I am always under harassment for roads and electricity by people who at the same time agitate for higher salaries and allowances, as I have already pointed out above, I may resort to one alternative i.e.
borrowing from NSSF to do some of the urgently required roads. We may have to give a ten-year bond to NSSF in order to get 1.4 trillion shillings to construct about ten good roads like Arua-Oraba-Kaaya. Internal borrowing should always be looked at before we look at external borrowing. Therefore, those who have been talking about the roads in the manifesto should know that these roads will be done in one way or the other.


I have spent a lot of time talking about two of the four factors I said were the main themes of this Address as far as the economy was concerned. These are: the recovery of the economy in the last 26 years and disagreements amongst us on the prioritization for the use of scarce resources.

There are two other factors I need to talk about briefly. These are: sabotage or delay of vital projects as well as corruption and selfishness. It is bad enough for villagers to not fully understand the importance of factories. It is a disaster for leaders to do the same while at the same time they are drawing salaries out of salaries paid by the very factories. We have had delays of factories in Lugazi, Amuru, Tororo, etc caused by this failure of leadership. This is not acceptable. If a leader has a criticism about the method of introducing a factory in one’s area, bring out the criticism in a constructive manner, in the right forum, as you also quickly bring forward a solution. There should be no acrimony, no delays because this is our factory.


Do not deceive yourselves that investors are dying to come here. They have got many places to go to. I attracted BIDCO to come to Kalangala. After some hassles, they started. Kalangala is now completely transformed because of their effort. They, from the beginning wanted to expand since they have idle machinery here. As usual, there were delays by the system here manned by people who do not know where the future belongs. Meanwhile, BIDCO has already got 70,000 hectares of land in Nigeria where they are going to produce 350,000 metric tonnes of palm oil
This is compared to 16,000 metric tonnes of palm oil produced in Kalangala where Government gave them 6,200 hectares of land plus 2,800 hectares of land from out-growers. Who is the loser? Certainly, not the investor. The ones tied to an under-developed Uganda are not the investors; it is the Ugandans, especially the poor ones who cannot go for greener pastures. The investors are mobile with their money.


All the Ugandan leaders must learn how to ‘kwogeleza’ (to woe) as we do with brides when it comes to investors. You do not hold press conferences to discuss the issues with your intended bride. Matters are discussed confidentially and with respect. You may not agree, you may modify arrangements, but it is all done with seriousness and courtesy. If you can do all that for a single bride how about this country of 34 million people? Are we not condemning to doom the future of this ‘bridegroom’ by our conduct, we, his agents? Nevertheless, the officials who handle these should also be serious. Ask the right questions quickly. Who is the legal owner of this land? If there are bibanja-owners, how are you engaging with them? If there are illegal squatters, how do we handle them? Handle issues thoroughly, knowledgeably but firmly and fairly. Knowledge creates confidence and firmness in decision making.

There is the issue of corruption and selfishness. Some of the frustrations to the investors are caused by corruption. Investors are harassed for bribes by these traitors. I do not know why the investors do not report this. I intend to bring a law to punish severely those who endanger our future on account of corruption, selfishness and opportunism.

Before I leave the sections on the economy, I would like to touch, briefly, on how the economy has performed since last year. You remember, soon after the elections of last year, the economy hit what I had long anticipated – some bad times. Owing to some drought but also due to increased Regional demand (which itself is a great opportunity for the region and serious producers), commodity prices went up. This was also due to increased world prices owing to the emergence of bigger middle classes in China, India, Brazil and to some extent, in Africa. As I told you in my previous speeches, it is, actually, good news for serious producers. On account of increased construction in the world, price for steel has gone up, price for sugar has gone up globally because of increased demand and so has the price of petroleum because of more people in the world, including Ugandans who are driving cars.


Additionally, the economies of the West are in decline because for long they have been leading an affluent lifestyle at the expense of the rest of the world especially Asia, Africa and Latin America. Prior to the emergence of China, India, Brazil and to some extent some parts of Africa out of poverty, much of the global resources were only supplying the West. That is why in the 1990s, when I was trying to market our steel in Muko near Kabale and Sukuru hills near Tororo, I was told that there was too much steel in the world, that there was a “steel glut”, as a consequence of that there was nobody willing to invest in iron-ore processing. At that time, the price of a tonne of steel was US$ 200. By last year, a tonne of steel had gone up to US$ 900. Why? It is because steel which was previously being used by only a small population of the world for construction of houses, making cars, etc., is now being used by billions of the world population. This is good news for Africa and for Uganda. Indeed, in 2011, we earned US$ 449 million from the export of coffee against US$267 million which we earned in 2010. In previous years, we earned as less as US$ 120 million annually from export of the same amount of coffee.

Therefore, Uganda had a lot of opportunities. On the one hand, Regional demand was going up and, on the other hand, prices for our commodities were also going up globally. The only negative aspect was that the consumption in Europe and USA was going down. We could, however, not fully take advantage of these opportunities because of previous mistakes committed against my advice and my entreaties to the various power centres. Particularly, relevant for these problems were the delays of Bujagali and sugar factories in Lugazi and Amuru. Instead of taking advantage of the Regional demand, the prices went up for the consumers. The price of sugar went up to about 10,000 shillings per kilogram.


The charlatans went into full gear. “The NRM Government has failed”. “They are useless”. I took time and explained to Ugandans on the radios and also explained to the NRM leaders at Kyankwanzi. You can go back and refer to my speeches and see that there is nothing I predicted that has not turned out to be true. The price of sugar is now at 3,000 shillings per kilogram. The exchange rate that had gone to 2,800 shillings per dollar has been hovering around 2,450 shillings per dollar, etc. Yet, we have not completed dealing with the real bottlenecks except electricity which is beginning to work out miracles in the economy. With just three turbines operational at Bujagali, i.e. 150 MW of the 250 MW total, there is already a remarkable change. I am told that industrialists are already very excited. They have shut down the standby generators that were causing them to ‘bleed’ so much. This is just the beginning. The Banyankore say: Ekihambo kirakutambire kikubanza obutuutu – the pumpkin plant that will solve your hunger problems starts by giving you the young pumpkins. English is a poor language; you cannot easily translate these very precise statements. What, then, will happen when Lugazi is expanded, Amuru is built
Sango Bay is built, Ziwa Ranch is turned into a sugar-cane plantation, Casement sugar in Kaliro starts, irrigation around the Rwenzori and the Elgon areas are expanded and we start using fertilizers, etc? The sky is the limit!


Nevertheless, I should not forget to say “shame to the charlatans”, “shame to the liars”, “shame to the opportunists”.

Before I conclude this section, I would like to add that Besigye’s lawlessness added to the problem of the relative scarcity of the dollars hence the loss of value of the Uganda shilling. The fujo and the false stories that were being sent out of Uganda scared tourists for some time. This meant less dollar inflows, dollar appreciation and more difficulties for KACITA, the importers. However, for exporters and those who are dependent on local production, it meant more opportunities. Whenever you would export, you would earn more because a dollar was giving you more shillings. It should, however, be sacrilege to have political actors who tell lies about the destiny of Ugandan people.

The Minister of Finance, in the budget speech, will deal with the short-term and medium-term tactical issues that are meant to further help the economy. I have been dealing with the strategic issues in this speech.

Apart from the economy, the other issue has been the indiscipline of Dr. Besigye and a small clique of his. I congratulate the Parliament of Uganda for administering democratic political kiboko to the Forum for Democratic Change (FDC) during the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) elections. I congratulate all the candidates that were elected - NRM and non-NRM. The egocentrism
of Dr. Besigye and his group has totally isolated them from all positive thinking people. Once you pass the Public Order and Management Bill and I sign it, the fujo will stop. I congratulate the Police for defeating this conspiracy by Dr. Besigye of attempting to overthrow the Constitution by insurrection.


The Police was able to protect people’s property in the markets and shops from looters organized by Dr. Besigye. Unfortunately, there were some deaths including that of a Police officer. The Public Order and Management Act will make all this impossible. There is, however, some laxity in the legal system. Why should any judicial officer release on bail somebody who has repeatedly abused the terms of the bail? Is this not an abuse of office? Is this not possibly corruption?

The media is also another corrupt, irresponsible and unprofessional group. Some of my supporters have been asking me for money to bribe characters that are called DJs so as to get favourable coverage in the media. I told my supporters that I would never give them that money. It is the duty of every Media House (radio, TV or news paper) to ensure that they give balanced and objective coverage of any story. It is an obligation on them and not a favour to the public. Any Media House that does not do it will lose out. I will show you how if they continue. We do not have to bribe anybody. The power of licensing belongs to the State. The State of Uganda has got a historical mission: Nationalism, Pan-Africanism, Socio-economic transformation and Democracy. It is the duty of every Media House to further these aims. I hope they will listen to my advice.

Otherwise, the country is peaceful. The UPDF is much stronger than ever before. There are only a few gaps in our overall defence, which will be closed in the coming years’ budgets.
Ugandans have relaxed on HIV/AIDS. I hear the prevalence rate has gone up to 7%. More dangerously, new infections were 129,000 in 2011 up from 115,000 in 2007. This is an increase of about 3,500 new infections per annum. What a big shame! Why should anybody get HIV/AIDS today when all the information on prevention is available? HIV/AIDS only is transmitted through promiscuity. Close this gap. Some of the interventions cover up this failure. Anti-promiscuity measures must be emphasized.


Madam Speaker, I congratulate you, your Deputy and Hon. Members upon completing some of the work of Parliament over the past year, who as at 21st May 2012 had been able to transact business as follows:

(i) Bills passed – 11
(ii) Motions for Resolutions – 40
(iii) Reports considered and adopted – 23
(iv) Petitions considered – 20
(v) Ministerial Statements presented and debated – 35
(vi) Other Statements – 15
vii) Questions for oral answer responded to – 07


Among the Bills passed were:
(i) The Companies Bill 2009.
(ii) The Prohibition and Prevention of Torture Bill, 2010.
(iii) The Uganda National Meteorological Authority Bill 2010.
(iv) The Transfer of Convicted Offenders Bill 2007.

I thank you Madam Speaker, Your Deputy, Hon. Members and the Technical Support Staff for what you have been able to accomplish during the last twelve months. Since quite a number of Bills are still pending, I request the Business Committee to look at what is pending and sort out what can be fast tracked.

A list of Bills from Ministries/Departments which may be presented to Parliament during the next twelve months is appended hereto. (Appendix II).

Finally, I congratulate the Honourable Margaret Zziwa who was elected as Speaker of EALA the other day. There was some confusion in the Newspapers to the effect that there was an NRM official candidate. There was no official candidate because the NRM Caucus had not chosen one.


I thank you very much.
































Thursday, May 31, 2012

Mafabi sacks UPC, DP ministers over elections



The rift in the Opposition in Parliament was yesterday laid bare after the leader of opposition sacked the UPC and DP shadow ministers over a disagreement on EALA representation.


In yesterday’s election, official results indicated that NRM’s Dora Byamukama, Bernard Mulengani, Dan Kidega, Nusura Tiperu, Michael Kennedy Ssebalu and Margaret Zziwa would be joined by UPC’s Chris Opoka (233 votes) and DP’s Fred Mukasa Mbidde (247) as Uganda’s representatives.

The tight race for the single independents slot was won by Ms Susan Nakawuki (106), having defeated fellow former MPs Martin Wandera (95) and Ben Wacha (87).

However, Leader of the Opposition Nandala Mafabi questioned the manner in which the UPC and DP nominated members for EALA yet, “there were no consultations between the different parties.” UPC Whip and the DP Deputy Whip still sharply disagreed with him. Ms Betty Amongi, the UPC whip, was the first to object, saying UPC consulted and even reached out to the NRM for support. “I would like to put it on record that after the meeting [of all parties] in Parliament, UPC as an independent party in Parliament consulted and the party made a decision to nominate a candidate,” she said.

“We consulted with the DP President Mao and he also told us that he had consulted his fellow members and had nominated a candidate.”


And then DP chipped in.

“Democratic Party is a party on its own and its sign is a Hoe. Not a bus, not fingers or any other thing,” said Mr Joseph Ssewungu, the deputy DP Whip. “We as MPs follow what both our Party president Norbert Mao and secretary general tell us and when they met, they decided on a candidate we should support and that’s the person we presented here.”

 After failing to rally the two parties to support his proposal to block the election process, Mr Mafabi, who was accused by NRM MPs of “failing in his work as the Leader of Opposition and exposing his lack of power to manage the opposition”, stood up and announced the dismissal of the “uncooperative” parties from the shadow cabinet.

“I am now going to show you that I have power,” he said. “FDC is not going to participate in these elections and furthermore, I suspend UPC and DP from the opposition cabinet henceforth.”

He added: I thought that we were working together as opposition. Little did I know that the colleagues I was leading turned against me! I thought these were colleagues I was with in the opposition but I was wrong.”


Mr Mafabi told Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi, whom he was looking directly in the eye, to only deal with FDC as the only Opposition in Parliament. “To the Prime Minister,” said Mr Mafabi, “from now on there is only one party in the Opposition that you should deal with and that is FDC.”

Mr Odonga Otto (FDC, Aruu) accused the two parties of betrayal. “They should formally form an alliance with the NRM because we [Official Opposition] are being shot from the front and from the back,” he said.

However, the Speaker of Parliament, Ms Rebecca Kadaga, told the LOP that all MPs from the Opposition were elected from independent parties. “The MPs from DP and UPC were elected to this House on their independent tickets and they are here as such. The shadow cabinet is your business,” she said.

The sacked shadow ministers include Fr Jacinta Ogwal, UPC and minister for disaster, Benson Obua Ogwal, UPC and minister of ICT and communication and Ms Amongi, UPC.

From DP, Mr Mathias Mpuuga, the minister of corruption and presidency; Mr Medard Ssegona, the minister for justice; Ms Betty Namboze Bakireke, minister of local government, Mr Lulume Bayiga the minister for health and Mr Ssebuliba Mutumba the minister of works.
On May 22, 2012, the five opposition parties in Parliament signed a joint statement in which they committed not to nominate candidates to EALA before consensus is reached on satisfying the requirement of Article 50(i) of the EAC Treaty. The statement was read out at a press conference at the Inter-Party Cooperation headquarters.









Toys & Games

Play Suduku.