Electronics

Kindle

Monday, February 24, 2014

President Museveni's full speech at signing of Anti-Homosexuality bill



President Museveni signs the Anti-Homosexuality bill into law shortly before delivering his speech in which he lashed out at the Western countries. Photo by William Rujuta



In Summary
He then went ahead to stress that Uganda is a rich country that does not need aid, because aid is in itself a problem. This all happened this afternoon at state house Entebbe. Read the full address of the President below

President Museveni today assented to the anti-homosexuality bill, making it a law amidst debate and controversies from Western powers and Human rights activists. The President stressed that despite US president barrack Obama getting disappointed with the signing of this bill, We (Ugandans) have also been disappointed for a very long time too by the policies of the west that do not make us "happy".


He then went ahead to stress that Uganda is a rich country that does not need aid, because aid is in itself a problem. This all happened this afternoon at state house Entebbe. Read the full address of the President below:

It seems the topic of homosexuals was provoked by the arrogant and careless Western groups that are fond of coming into our schools and recruiting young children into homosexuality and lesbianism, just as they carelessly handle other issues concerning Africa.

Initially, I did not pay much attention
to it because I was busy with the immediate issues of defense, security, electricity, the roads, the railways, factories, modernization of agriculture, etc.


When, eventually, I concentrated my mind on it, I distilled three problems:
1. those who were promoting homo-sexuality and recruiting normal people into it;
2. as a consequence of No. 1 above, many of those recruited were doing so for mercenary reasons – to get money – in effect homosexual prostitutes; these mercenary homosexual prostitutes had to be punished;
3. Homosexuals exhibiting themselves; Africans are flabbergasted by exhibitionism of sexual acts – whether heterosexual or otherwise and for good reason. Why do you exhibit your sexual conduct? Are you short of opportunity for privacy - where you can kiss, fondle (kukirigiita, kwagaaga) etc.?

Are we interested in seeing your sexual acts – we the Public? I am not able to understand the logic of the Western Culture. However, we Africans always keep our opinions to ourselves and never seek to impose our point of view on the others. If only they could let us alone.

It was my view that the above three should be punished harshly in order to defend our society from disorientation. Therefore, on these three I was in total accord with the MPs and other Ugandans. I had, however, a problem with Category 4 or what I thought was category 4 – those “born” homosexual.

I thought there were such people – those who are either genetic or congenital homosexuals. The reason I thought so was because I could not understand why a man could fail to be attracted to the beauties of a woman and, instead, be attracted to a fellow man. It meant, according to me, that there was something wrong with that man – he was born a homosexual – abnormal.
I, therefore, thought that it would be wrong to punish somebody because of how he was created, disgusting though it may be to us. That is why I refused to sign the Bill. In order to get to the truth, we involved Uganda Scientists as well as consulting Scientists from outside Uganda.


My question to them was: “Are there people that are homosexual right from birth?”. After exhaustive studies, it has been found that homosexuality is in two categories: there are those who engage in homosexuality for mercenary reasons on account of the under – developed sectors of our economy that cause people to remain in poverty, the great opportunities that abound not withstanding; and then there are those that become homosexual by both nature (genetic) and nurture (up-bringing).

The studies that were done on identical twins in Sweden showed that 34% - 39% were homosexual on account of nature and 66% were homosexual on account of nurture.

Therefore, even in those studies, nurture was more significant than nature. Can somebody be homosexual purely by nature without nurture? The answer is: “No”. No study has shown that. Since nurture is the main cause of homosexuality, then society can do something about it to discourage the trends. That is why I have agreed to sign the Bill.

Since Western societies do not appreciate politeness, let me take this opportunity to warn our people publicly about the wrong practices indulged in and promoted by some of the outsiders.

One of them is “oral sex”. Our youth should reject this because God designed the human being most appropriately for pleasurable, sustainable and healthy sex. Some of the traditional styles are very pleasurable and healthy. The mouth is not engineered for that purpose except kissing. Besides, it is very unhealthy. People can even contract gonorrhea of the mouth and throat on account of so-called “oral sex”, not to mention worms, hepatitis E, etc.
The Ministry of Gender and Youth should de-campaign this buyayism imported from outside and sensitize the youth about the healthy life style that is abundant in our cultures.

We reject the notion that somebody can be homosexual by choice; that a man can choose to love a fellow man; that sexual orientation is a matter of choice. Since my original thesis that there may be people who are born homosexual has been disproved by science, then the homosexuals have lost the argument in Uganda.


They should rehabilitate themselves and society should assist them to do so.

Yoweri K. Museveni Gen. (Rtd)
P R E S I D E N T








Sunday, February 16, 2014

HKRAC doesn’t have the balls to fight in the USM arena


Dear Vision First & HKRAC,


After reading the below, I was greatly pained and still feel my Heart bleeding as a person who was once a Refugee and a client to both organizations. It's so unfortunate to see you two powerfull institutions changing the frontline yet the desperate asylum seekers and refugees in Hong Kong hopes are in your hands. If you both have the interests of this poor members of society, then you must fight the same battle NOT turning the guns on yourselves. I hope your clients themselves will be able to judge your actions.



Yours concerned,

Wilson Lakony. HKRAC doesn’t have the balls to fight in the USM arena


Dear Aleta –
In reply to your below email requesting use of our notice board, we are not posting your flyer, and here are my thoughts why.
First, there is little you can teach about USM that is not in the public arena already and hasn’t been torn apart by the Hong Kong Bar Association 14 February 2014 submission.

Second, we appreciate that HKRAC’s days as the UNHCR golden boy are over. We blogged in “Winners and Losers” that HKRAC is about to experience a culture shock entering shark-infested USM waters. To achieve results in this arena more than cocktail parties are necessary as the opponent of refugees is fierce and powerful.
Most lawyers in the “Big City” law firms that support HKRAC are clueless about the cruel oppression refugees suffer. It is of concern that they are mostly unqualified to represent protection claimants at the Immigration Department, unable to face racist magistrates and unskilled for judicial reviews in the High Court. There is less than a dozen human rights lawyers in town and Duty Lawyer Service will not assign more cases to them.

If HKRAC cannot give legal advice or appoint pro bono lawyers, then it is reduced to a pathetic signboard pointing the way towards a process in which it has no say and no power.

Refugees desperately require either legal advice, which HKRAC cannot give, or fearless advocacy, which HKRAC cannot stomach!
Had you paid attention to OCCUPY ISS, you would know that Vision First is closed to support the Refugee Union’s historic occupation of a despotic contractor. Not only did I sleep in the streets for three days, ready for a police assault, but I haven’t been to the office since 10 February and won’t return until ISS falls.
On the frontline, the absence of HKRAC and other NGOs and churches serving refugees was regrettably noted. Instead of emailing about our notice board, you could have bolstered the protest line with your staff and flyers – that would have earned you great respect!
Similarly, instead of sitting at your desk, you could have inspected refugee ghettos and offered assistance to a thousand neglected refugees, who supposedly didn’t fit your lucrative business model before.

Let me vent some anger (which is well pondered over), by saying that it is apparent to us that HKRAC doesn’t have the balls to fight in the USM arena. There is tremendous brutality behind Immigration, Duty Lawyer Service, adjudicators and their hard-line trainers.

If you don’t know the enemy how can you enter the fight? We just hope HKRAC will become an asset in this fierce battle. But be aware that nothing you have learnt at UNHCR can prepare you for this dirty fight!

Cosmo
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Aleta Miller <######@hkrac.org>

Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:54 PM

Subject: HKRAC USM info sessions

To: Danielle Stutterd

Dear Danielle,
I hope you are well. I’m attaching a flyer about new group information sessions on the USM which HKRAC are launching. Please find a flyer attached.

I’d be grateful if you could print the flyer and put it on the notice board in your center so that your clients can have access to the sessions. We can also drop some smaller leaflets to your centre if you would like to have them available to your clients.
I’m always happy to talk more about our services and answer any questions you may have, don’t hesitate to ask. Let me know if you’d like us to drop some flyers over.

Warm regards,

Aleta Miller
Executive Director
Hong Kong Refugee Advice Centre



Toys & Games

Play Suduku.